Compulsory Voting: A Remedy or Ruse for Democracy?
The debate over compulsory voting centers on a trade-off between participation and liberty. Scholars emphasize that democracy relies on political participation, but should it be mandatory? A key aspect of democracy is that citizens affected by institutions should have a voice.
Without active citizen engagement, representative institutions may fail to reflect the preferences of the governed. Elections are a cornerstone of democracy, yet global voter turnout has been declining, raising concerns about the health of democratic systems and the legitimacy of those who govern.
Citizens who are impacted by institutions should have a say.
The Institute of Development Studies invites you to shape future priorities by taking a five-minute survey. This discussion is particularly relevant for the IDS MA Governance, Development & Public Policy 2024-25 scholars.
Autor's resume: Democracy needs participation.
More News
- Editorial: Most Americans don’t think either Democrats or Republicans care about them
- Early voting begins Saturday across Long Island ahead of Election Day 2025
- Compulsory voting: A remedy or ruse for democracy? - Institute of Development Studies
- A New Ultra-Luxury Private Island in the Maldives Is Revealed - Hospitality & Catering News
- Trump Stops Biden’s Euro-Style Solution to Flight Delays and Paves Way To Lower Fares
- Science museum files lawsuit to have Pérez Art Museum Miami’s billboard removed
- Let’s Teach What We’re Voting For
- Motorsports Has a Growing TV Accessibility Problem in the U.S.
- Federal workers going without paychecks feel strain of government shutdown
- The TrumpRx website won’t slash drug prices — but this will