The 50th Anniversary of Sir John Kerr's Dismissal
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day when governor-general Sir John Kerr lawfully used a constitutional power to end a deep political deadlock and ensure the Crown received necessary funds to operate the government.
Controversy Surrounding Sir John Kerr
Despite acting within his constitutional authority, Sir John Kerr has faced harsh criticism both during his life and posthumously. It is important to clarify that Kerr did not remove a government due to its incompetence—the Australian people did that. Kerr merely provided the opportunity for that change, which was a consequence rather than the reason behind his decision.
Anticipated Renewed Criticism
This anniversary is expected to bring a fresh wave of criticism against Kerr, with multiple events highlighting the controversy:
- A new biography of Whitlam
- A Sky News Australia documentary
- A full-day event organised by the Museum of Australian Democracy, streamed live from Old Parliament House
Partisan Perspectives in the Anniversary Events
The live event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, features journalists and academics known for their strong opposition to Kerr, including Paul Kelly, Troy Bramston, and Professor Jenny Hocking. Most participants have Labor affiliations, predicting a fierce debate overshadowing the commemorative nature of the day.
"Sir John Kerr did not deliver us from a grossly incompetent government. The people of Australia did that. Sir John Kerr simply gave them the opportunity to do so."
Such events will likely stir significant controversy around the parliamentary triangle on what is otherwise a solemn occasion.
Author's summary: The 50th anniversary of Kerr's dismissal reignites partisan debates, with defenders emphasizing constitutional authority and critics focusing on political bias surrounding the event.